King richard iii and looking for richard comparative essay
If a king does not have this foresight within his nature, or if he God more greatly than a blasphemous utterance from a commoner. Thus, in both Macbeth and Richard II, Shakespeare outlines the duties of kingship, and implies that to deny such responsibilities is to betray God, the state and the people. Throughout his plays, Shakespeare explores the nature, duties and responsibilities of kingship. Composers throughout various zeitgeists are linked by different representations of universal human concerns, and their texts simultaneously embody certain values and agendas individual to themselves.
To what extent is this made evident in the pair of texts you have studied? The texts therefore could not be more different, although it is through the connections in the texts that the responder gains a heightened awareness of the values underpinning the text. By creating connections between texts the reader is provided with insight into the theme of power and in particular the pursuit of power. The evil protagonist, Richard, plots the deaths of those that stand in his way; his older brother Clarence and his two child nephews. His pursuit of power is so strong that he is free from moral limitations and so can commit these murders. Richard sends Clarence to the tower under the impression that he will be safe, however Richard sends two murderers to the tower to kill him. Caliban is like the Evil Angel.
Comparison of King Richard III and Looking for Richard
Shakespeare shows the journey in Richard I of Richard himself on his dark quest to becoming king by both using his literary skills and performance to attain what he wants, ultimately being power. Whereas Pacino is being more provocative. He is challenging the authority that the British literary world has over Shakespeare. He wants to be king — Tudor Myth — had to ingratiate to the Tudor house and uphold their reign. However Shakespeare had to ingratiate his monarch, the Tudor House and ensure Tudor patronage.
Shakespeare has used a metaphor here to describe the seriousness of the issue at heart. The war is described as a monster that opens his jaws and ensnaring people lives into abysmal darkness. The effect of metaphorical language entails to the reader the intelligence of King Henry in not only his choice of words but highlighting the consequences to the French king. It is through King Henry's intelligent choices that has made him such a successful and fearful leader by being not only being a fearsome warrior. He also effectively established ethos and used elevated diction to strengthen his claim.