Lastly we can rely on the principles of deduction, because we know for a fact that what is being studied or what is happening is for certain. Whereas induction, is just a possible theory with possible faults; something we cannot rely on. For these main reasons rationalism is a better theory of knowledge and provides a deeper truth than empiricism. Descartes is a profound philosopher who came up with many good thoughts about the branch of philosophy,…. The importance of a valid argument form is to have structure of the ideas.
Epistemology' and Education' Theories | Free Essay Example
Other statements in both books Meno and Phaedo prove to be hypocritical. I mean Other explanations are also lacking: if we are to believe this theory of recollected knowledge, then how did the soul initially gain any knowledge? If the opinion is temporary to each body, then what was the source of this knowledge of forms we recollect? Socrates questions Protagoras, the sophist, on the teachability of virtue. The latter in the argument argues that virtue can in fact be passed on, as well as the former arguing the opposition.
The activities of reason are dualistic in nature. First, there is inference, in which we move from old knowledge to new knowledge. The strongest form of this is valid deductive inference, which occurs when it is not possible that our premises are true of our conclusion is false, but I will deal with this more clearly later.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document. The very concept itself is contradictory, but is still a topic worth exploring. If a person were to simply go about their life believing everything they ever heard or experienced to be true, they could be deceived without their own knowledge. However, sometimes senses can be useful in arriving at a proven truth.