A systematic review attempts to collate all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria in order to answer a specific research question. Summary of Types of LIterature Reviews. Evidence maps and systematic maps. Systematically and transparently collects and categorizes existing evidence on a broad question of policy or management importance. May critically evaluate existing evidence, but does not attempt to synthesize the results in the way a systematic review would. Literature Narrative Review.
Home - Literature Review - Library Guides at Charles Sturt University
What is a systematic review? A "high-level overview of primary research on a focused question" utilizing high quality research evidence through:. Source: Kysh, Lynn : Difference between a systematic review and a literature review. Depending on your learning style, please explore the resources in various formats on the tabs above.
Towards a universal model of family centered care: a scoping review
A literature review is an integrated analysis-- not just a summary-- of scholarly writings that are related directly to your research question. That is, it represents the literature that provides background information on your topic and shows a correspondence between those writings and your research question. A literature review may be a stand alone work or the introduction to a larger research paper, depending on the assignment.
To advance evidence-based health care practice by providing search expertise, guidance and support for conducting systematic reviews and similar review methodologies at Temple University for all medical and health sciences disciplines. You should "Work with a librarian or other information specialist trained in performing systematic reviews to plan the search strategy. The service includes a variety of review types.